Consensus

Consensus

Consensus · 程式設計

Consensus is an AI academic search engine and research assistant that answers questions using peer-reviewed papers rather than open web pages. You type a question in plain language. It pulls matching studies from a corpus of more than 220 million papers, then writes a cited summary of what those studies found and where the peer-reviewed sources disagree. So it suits students, clinicians, and researchers who need real scientific sources instead of a chatbot's best guess.

Consensus 的介面預覽

關於 Consensus

What Is Consensus

Consensus is a research tool built around one constraint: only scholarly literature counts. Where a general chatbot answers from whatever it absorbed during training, Consensus runs a scientific paper search over actual journal articles, conference papers, and preprints, then summarizes them with links back to each source. That difference matters most when you need to defend an answer to a supervisor, a reviewer, or a patient.

Consensus, the company behind it, was founded in 2021 by Christian Salem and Eric Olson and now based in San Francisco. The product works as a web app, with a mobile app on Google Play and iOS, plus integrations that let you run Consensus searches inside ChatGPT, Claude, and Microsoft 365 Copilot. Its corpus comes from Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, and the company's own crawl of the scholarly web. The team describes coverage as nearly all high-impact journals plus the full PubMed index.

The obvious limit? Scope. Consensus won't tell you the capital of Germany, and it won't help with anything outside peer-reviewed research. It also isn't a writing tool. It hands you evidence and citations, not finished prose. If your question is medical, legal, or personal rather than scientific, you're using the wrong instrument. And the free tier caps the number of Deep reviews and AI messages you get each month, so heavy users run into the paywall quickly.

Getting Started

  1. Create an account at consensus.app, or sign in through the ChatGPT or Claude integration if you'd rather stay inside a tool you already use.
  2. Type a research question in plain language. Keywords work ("cash transfers and poverty"), full research questions work, and yes/no phrasing works best because it triggers the Consensus Meter.
  3. Narrow the results with filters for publication date, study type, sample size, journal quartile, citation count, open-access status, and academic field.
  4. Open individual papers to read extracted findings, or use Ask Paper to ask follow-up questions about a single study.
  5. Save papers into Collections, then export citations in RIS, BibTeX, or CSV format for whatever reference manager you use.

產品資訊

快速了解 Consensus 的定價、支援平台與效能。

免費方案是
付費方案$0 - $65/mo
平台Web, iOS, Android, ChatGPT, Claude, Microsoft 365 Copilot
開發者Consensus
類別程式設計
發布日期Aug 2022
最近更新Sep 2026
網站訪問量5.8M
網站全球排名9.8K
API 提供狀態是

適合對象

這項工具最適合的使用者、任務與情境。

使用者

  • Students and grad students
  • Clinicians and health professionals
  • Researchers and R&D teams

任務

  • Checking whether a claim is actually settled
  • Building a literature review
  • Interrogating one paper

情境

  • Before a journal club or a supervisor meeting
  • Early-stage project scoping
  • Fact-checking a claim you saw in the news

主要功能

AI Answers Grounded in Peer-Reviewed Papers

Every response starts with retrieval, not generation. Consensus scans its corpus using semantic search and keyword matching, picks the most relevant papers, and only then writes a summary that cites each source. That means you can trace any sentence back to the study it came from. It's the main reason people pick this over a general AI chatbot.

Consensus Meter and Consensus Snapshot

Ask a yes/no question. The Meter shows the split of scientific opinion, backed by an overview of the papers on each side. The Snapshot view goes further and reports four quality indicators for each position: how recent the papers are, how many are meta-analyses, systematic reviews, or randomized controlled trials, the average journal rank, and citation counts. It's a blunt instrument. A one-paper position still looks like a position. Still beats guessing.

Pro Search and Deep Review Modes

Pro Search is the everyday literature review tool: it answers questions with citations in a conversational format. Deep Review takes longer. It produces a full literature review across a larger set of studies, which you want when you need the state of a field rather than a single answer. Think hours of reading, compressed. Plan tiers are largely defined by how many Deep reviews you get: 3 on Free, 15 on Pro, 200 on Deep, and 50 per user on Teams.

Ask Paper

Ask Paper turns one study into a conversation. Instead of skimming a 20-page PDF for the sample size or the measurement method, you open the paper and ask. Done. It saves the most time on a narrow question, and it behaves least like a search engine.

Study Snapshots, Citation Graph, and Collections

Study Snapshots pull out key findings and the methods behind them so the results list is scannable. The Citation Graph shows how papers relate to one another. That helps when you're hunting the foundational work behind a recent result. Collections hold papers you want to keep, and everything exports to RIS, BibTeX, or CSV.

Filters and Complex Queries

Filters cover publication date, study type, sample size, journal quartile, citation count, academic field, country, and open-access status. You can also ask comparative questions ("carbon taxes vs cap-and-trade") or request a format like a pros-and-cons list. Filtering for human randomized controlled trials is the difference between a useful answer and a pile of animal studies.

API and MCP Access

The Consensus API is a single REST endpoint. It returns ranked papers with titles, authors, journals, publication years, citation counts, and links, and it supports the same filters as the web app. It shares a monthly call pool with MCP usage. That pool is 30 calls on Free, 500 on Pro, 2,000 on Deep. Extra calls cost $0.05 each for paid users. Not free, but cheap. API keys are self-serve from your account dashboard.

優缺點

優點

  • Every AI answer carries citations back to the original paper, so claims stay checkable.
  • The corpus covers more than 220 million papers, drawing on Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, and Consensus's own crawl. Full PubMed coverage is included.
  • The Consensus Meter gives a quick read on whether a yes/no question is actually settled in the literature.
  • Filters for study type, sample size, and journal quartile let you exclude weak evidence. No scrolling required.
  • A free tier and a self-serve API make it cheap to test before committing. Low risk.

缺點

  • Anything outside peer-reviewed literature returns nothing useful. It can't replace a general search engine for everyday questions.
  • The free tier is thin for real work: 3 Deep reviews, 10 Pro messages, and 30 API calls a month won't carry a thesis.
  • Deep reviews burn through credits fast, and the jump from $20 to $65 per month is steep for occasional users.
  • Consensus summarizes and links. It doesn't draft your paper, so you still do the writing.

常見問題

Consensus is used to answer research questions with peer-reviewed evidence. It searches scientific papers, summarizes what they found, and cites each source. That makes it useful for literature reviews, evidence checks, and coursework where claims need backing. It isn't built for general knowledge questions.

相關內容

探索與 Consensus 相關的工具、技能與文章。

Consensus 替代方案

Forefront

Forefront

Forefront · 程式設計

Forefront 是一個用來打造開源 AI 的網頁平台。你可以用自己的資料微調主流的開源語言模型、評估它們的表現,再透過 API 執行,或匯出後自行架設。想要封閉式平台的便利、卻堅持要自己擁有模型與資料的開發者,就是這裡的目標客群。

免費 / $0 - $99/mo查看詳情
Startkit

Startkit

StartKit.AI · 程式設計

Startkit 是一套用來打造 AI SaaS 與 AI 包裝產品的樣板。可以把它想成一個 AI 新創樣板,把枯燥的部分都先接好了:驗證、Stripe 與 Lemon Squeezy 付款、用量限制、交易型電子郵件,以及一套能與 OpenAI、Anthropic、Groq 或 Llama 溝通的 AI API 啟動套件。你複製儲存庫、設定價格,然後專心在產品中使用者真正願意付費的部分。它建構於 React 與 Tailwind 之上的 Next.js,所以大部分的樣板程式碼對你來說並不陌生。

付費 / $99 - $499 one-time查看詳情
Testim

Testim

Tricentis · 程式設計

Testim 是專為網頁、行動與 Salesforce 應用程式打造的 AI 測試自動化平台,用來建立並執行端到端測試。它靠機器學習在介面變動時維持測試穩定,團隊因此少花時間修補壞掉的定位器。對於一款今天就能開始使用的自動化測試工具來說,這表現不算差。你透過在瀏覽器錄製動作來建立測試,需要更多控制時再補上 JavaScript。對忙碌的 QA 團隊來說,這是個可靠的選擇。

免費 / Custom pricing on request查看詳情