AI Detector Pro
AI Detector Pro · AI Detection
AI Detector Pro is a citation verification tool for Florida court filings. It checks every cited case, statute, and rule against authoritative sources and flags the ones that don't exist or don't fit.
About AI Detector Pro
What Is AI Detector Pro
AI Detector Pro (ADP) is a web tool that acts as a legal citation checker for court documents. You upload a pleading, and it pulls out each case, statute, and rule, confirms the citation exists, then scores whether that authority actually supports the argument around it. The target is a specific modern failure: AI drafting tools produce citations that look real down to the reporter and page number, but point to cases that don't exist or have nothing to do with the matter at hand.
The product comes out of a landlord dispute. The founder couldn't afford an attorney, used AI to draft filings, and found the citations passed a surface check while being legally irrelevant. One documented example: Florida Statute 48.081, which covers serving process on corporations, cited in a motion about an individual defendant. The statute was real. It was still wrong. ADP was built to catch that gap without a Westlaw or LexisNexis subscription.
Two limits matter before you rely on it. It currently handles Florida state court filings only, so a federal or out-of-state matter falls outside its scope. And it's in beta, which means every pricing tier is free right now and the feature set is still moving.
Getting Started
- Create a free account with an email signup at aidetectorpro.com.
- Upload a pleading as a PDF or DOCX, or paste the text straight into the app.
- Let the tool extract every citation automatically, then run the verification pass.
- Read the color-coded report to see which citations are verified, which aren't found, and which may not apply.
- Fix or replace the flagged entries, then re-run the check before you file.
Product Information
A quick look at AI Detector Pro's pricing, supported platforms, and performance.
Best for
The users, tasks, and scenarios where this tool fits best.
Users
- Pro se litigants
- Small-firm attorneys
- Paralegals and legal assistants
- Law students learning citation practice
Tasks
- Checking a drafted motion for bad citations
- Spotting citation-argument mismatch
- Building a fix-it list before filing
- Comparing how multiple AI models read a citation
- Finding a better authority
Scenarios
- Filing on a deadline with no time for a full re-read
- Working a case at night without legal support
- Sanity-checking AI-assisted drafting
- Reviewing an opponent's filing
Key features
Citation verification against authoritative sources
ADP breaks a filing into individual citations and checks each one against the Florida Statutes index, the Rules of Civil Procedure, CourtListener, and Google Scholar. It confirms the authority exists and reports whether it was found, so a case that never got overruled but simply doesn't exist doesn't slip through. That confirmation step is the core of the tool, and it runs without a paid legal database.
Applicability scoring with multiple AI models
Confirming a citation exists is only half the job, since a real case can still be cited for a point it never decided. ADP uses several independent AI models to judge whether each authority actually supports the surrounding argument, then blends their answers into a consensus confidence score. The deep analysis view shows each model's reasoning, so you can see why a citation was flagged instead of trusting a bare verdict.
Color-coded verification report
The output is a report that sorts every citation into verified, not found, or possibly not applicable. Source links point back to CourtListener or Google Scholar, and each entry keeps the surrounding document context so you can tell which argument the citation was tied to. A downloadable report is available on the paid tiers once the beta ends.
Alternative case suggestions
When a cited authority doesn't hold up, ADP suggests cases that might actually support the argument. That turns a dead end into a starting point for research rather than just a rejection. It matters most when a draft leans on a hallucinated citation and you need a real replacement quickly.
Document context per citation
Every flagged citation is shown alongside the passage it was drawn from. You see the sentence and the claimed point, not just a case name in a list. That context is what separates a useful report from a raw error dump, since a citation only counts as wrong relative to what it's being used to prove.
No subscription barrier
The tool runs without a Westlaw or LexisNexis account, which is the whole reason it exists. Traditional citation databases bill firms thousands of dollars a month, and that cost is what shut out individual filers. ADP keeps the verification step open to anyone who can upload a document during the beta.
Pros and cons
Pros
- Catches hallucinated citations that look correct on the surface, including real statutes cited for the wrong type of party.
- Runs without a paid legal database subscription, which opens citation checking to people who were priced out before.
- The multi-model applicability check goes past existence to whether a case actually fits the argument.
- Every tier is free during the beta, so there's no cost to test it on a real filing.
- Clear report format groups citations by status and links each one to its source.
Cons
- Covers Florida state court filings only, so it's useless for a federal case or a filing in another state.
- The beta pricing means a paid structure is coming, and current rates won't last.
- It flags citations for review, not as a final legal judgment, so a lawyer still has to make the call on what to fix.
- No public API is documented, which rules out embedding the check into a firm's own drafting workflow.
Frequently asked questions
It checks every legal citation in a Florida court filing, including cases, statutes, and rules. Each one is confirmed against authoritative sources, then scored for whether it supports the argument it's attached to. You get a report listing what's verified, what's not found, and what may not apply.
Related content
Explore related tools, skills, and articles for AI Detector Pro.
AI Detector Pro Alternatives
Isgen AI
Isgen · AI DetectionIsgen AI is a web-based AI detector that scores text for machine authorship and shows you which sentences and phrases push the number up. It's built for teachers, editors, students, and writers. Their question is simple: did this draft come from ChatGPT, GPT-5, Claude, Gemini, DeepSeek, or another model? You paste or upload content, run a scan, and get a Human, AI, and Mixed breakdown in seconds. There's also a companion editor that scores text while you write it.
Humanizeai Tools
Humanizeai Tools · Writing · AI DetectionHumanizeai Tools is a web-based AI humanizer that rewrites machine-generated text so it sounds like a person wrote it, which is the whole point of the category it belongs to. Paste a draft from ChatGPT, Claude, or Gemini, run it through the tool, and it swaps out the phrases and sentence patterns that AI detectors flag. If your goal is to make AI text sound human before you publish it, this is the kind of tool built for exactly that. It suits students, bloggers, and marketers who need copy that reads naturally and clears tools like GPTZero, Copyleaks, and Winston AI after a single pass.
Hidemyai
Hidemyai · Writing · AI DetectionHidemyai is an AI content humanizer. It rewrites text from ChatGPT, Jasper, and similar tools so the result reads like a person wrote it. You paste your draft, pick a document type and tone, and the service returns a version meant to bypass AI detectors such as Originality.ai, Turnitin, and ZeroGPT. It targets writers, marketers, and students who lean on AI drafts but can't ship copy that sounds robotic. The promise is simple: make AI content undetectable.