CONTADU

The planner starts with a seed keyword and builds a topical map of everything the search results suggest the subject includes. It marks the subjects your domain has covered and the ones left open, and it shows which competitors already rank for each. From that map you can generate an AI-assisted content plan: a list of suggested articles with the angle and format that already performs in those results. This is the part that builds topical authority rather than one-off posts.

The editor is the core of the product. It holds your draft next to a live list of NLP keywords and entities pulled from the top-ranking pages, and it scores coverage as you type. Terms you have covered turn green, ones you have skipped stay grey. You can also set target word counts and compare your structure heading by heading against the competing outlines, so a gap in the draft is visible before publication rather than after.

Beyond raw keywords, CONTADU identifies entities in the competing content: the people, places, organisations, and products that the pages keep mentioning. Including them makes a draft read as more specific, and the platform supports this across 19 languages. Google's systems tend to reward text that clearly identifies what it is about, so the entity list is often a more useful guide than a plain keyword table. The setup is closer to semantic SEO than to counting keyword repetitions.

Two generation paths exist. The writer produces a draft from a selected topic and template, with prompts you can adjust and the option to bring your own OpenAI or Anthropic API key. The Content Designer builds a structured article skeleton with headings and NLP terms already placed, which you then fill in. Both spend AI credits tied to your plan unless you use a personal key.

For any keyword, the platform lists the pages ranking near the top and shows what each one covers. That side-by-side view answers a question keyword tools handle poorly: what do the winners have that this draft does not. It also feeds the content gap list, where the subjects nobody covers well tend to be the easiest openings for a new piece.

The reporting module pulls Google Search Console data alongside the platform's own metrics, so you can see how published content is actually performing rather than how it scored at the time of writing. On the team side you assign documents to colleagues, set due dates, and track status. Agencies get unlimited seats in the sense that adding a writer does not raise the bill. Document quotas still apply to the account.