Uxia

Uxia

UXIA TESTING SOLUTIONS, S.L. · Coding

Uxia is an AI user testing platform that runs synthetic testers on prototypes and live products to surface UX friction in minutes, with no recruiting.

Interface preview of Uxia

About Uxia

What Is Uxia

Uxia is a UX research tool built by UXIA TESTING SOLUTIONS, S.L., a company based in Barcelona, Spain. It replaces the slowest part of usability testing, finding and scheduling real participants, with AI testers that navigate your product, finish tasks, and explain their reasoning.

The platform targets product designers, UX researchers, and growth teams that need feedback on a flow before it ships. You describe the audience, upload designs or connect a live URL, and the synthetic testers work through the mission on their own. Everything lands in a transcript that shows what each tester did and what they were thinking.

The main constraint is the nature of the testers. They simulate behavior from demographic and behavioral data, not from real customers, so the output reflects plausible patterns rather than proven purchase decisions. Uxia leans into a hybrid approach, letting you convert an AI test into a human test when you need recordings from real participants.

Getting Started

  1. Create an account on the Uxia platform, or book a demo if you want the team to walk you through it.
  2. Define your target audience by mixing demographic data, behavioral frameworks, and any persona documents you already have, or share your product URL.
  3. Upload your designs, a screen recording of a prototype, or connect a live website, then set the test mission and scenario.
  4. Review the synthetic tester profiles Uxia generates and pick the ones that match your customer base.
  5. Run the test, then read the transcripts, SUS and UXIA-Q benchmarks, and the summarised insights reports.

Product Information

A quick look at Uxia's pricing, supported platforms, and performance.

Free PlanYes
Paid PlansCustom pricing (contact sales)
PlatformWeb
DeveloperUXIA TESTING SOLUTIONS, S.L.
CategoryCoding
Release DateMay 2024
Latest UpdatedOct 2025
Website Visits21.8K
Website Global Rank1.3M
API AvailabilityN/A

Best for

The users, tasks, and scenarios where this tool fits best.

Users

  • Product designers
  • UX researchers
  • Small teams without a dedicated researcher
  • Agencies

Tasks

  • Testing a Figma prototype
  • Checking an onboarding sequence
  • Scoring a checkout flow
  • Validating an accessibility pass
  • Screening a live website

Scenarios

  • Weekly design iterations
  • Early project discovery
  • Cross-language products
  • Pre-launch review

Key features

AI User Test

Synthetic testers independently explore your product to complete a real user goal, then answer follow-up questions about what they saw. Each session captures clicks, expectations, and step-by-step reasoning, so you can read the story behind a friction point instead of guessing at it.

AI Live Website Test

Point Uxia at a live website and the AI testers interact with it the way a first-time visitor would. They move through login flows, forms, file uploads, and multi-step journeys on a product that is already online, which suits teams auditing a shipped experience.

AI User Research

The same synthetic testers can answer deeper qualitative questions, not just complete tasks. This suits teams that want attitudinal feedback on a concept before committing research budget to moderated sessions with real people.

Accessibility Test

Uxia runs a dedicated pass to flag accessibility barriers in a flow, so issues surface before a compliance review catches them. It works best as a first filter, with a human accessibility audit following on anything the test flags. This is the same spirit as unmoderated usability testing, where participants work alone and a tool captures the session.

Human Test

Any AI test can be turned into a shareable human test to collect recordings, transcripts, and interactions from real participants. That hybrid option matters for teams that need both speed and research confidence, since you keep one dataset instead of juggling two platforms.

Benchmarking with SUS and UXIA-Q

Uxia scores a flow using SUS-style metrics, SUPR-Q equivalents, and its own UXIA-Q benchmark, then compares results against industry figures. This turns a usability test into a number you can track over time and show to stakeholders.

Pros and cons

Pros

  • Runs a usability test in minutes, which removes the recruit-and-schedule bottleneck that stalls most research.
  • Works on prototypes, static designs, live sites, and gated products, so you can test well before launch.
  • Supports over 20 languages, which helps teams validate localized flows without separate panels per market.
  • Combines AI and human testing in one platform, so you can escalate a synthetic test to a real one when stakes rise.
  • Produces shareable reports with SUS and UXIA-Q scores that non-researchers can read and act on.

Cons

  • The testers are synthetic, so findings show plausible behavior patterns rather than confirmed real-world reactions, which you should verify with humans on high-stakes calls.
  • Prototype testing needs a video recording or images of the flow, so you can't just drop in a static Figma link and have testers click it.
  • Paid pricing is quote-based with no public tiers, so budgeting takes a sales conversation instead of a quick check on a pricing page.
  • There's no documented public API, which limits teams that want to pull Uxia results into their own analytics stack.

Frequently asked questions

Uxia is a UX research tool that runs user testing with AI-based synthetic testers instead of recruited humans. You define a scenario, the testers move through your design or live site to complete a mission, and Uxia turns each session into transcripts, benchmarks, and summarised UX insights.