Autosana

The core of Autosana is writing tests the way you'd explain them to a colleague. You type "tap the login button and enter the test email," and the agent works out the steps itself. There are no XPath or CSS selectors to maintain, which is the usual source of broken automation. For teams that have watched a test suite die after a UI refresh, the change is that the instructions describe intent, not a specific element in the layout.

When the interface changes, the agent adapts the flow instead of failing outright. Autosana says its agents update tests based on code diffs, so a moved button or a renamed screen doesn't leave you fixing scripts by hand. This carries real weight for fast-moving teams: the CI suite keeps running through redesigns, and you spend less time on maintenance. It's the feature the product is built around, and the one that separates it from older E2E tools.

Autosana covers mobile apps and websites from the same platform. You can run flows on iOS, Android, or web browsers, either locally or on cloud-hosted devices with no setup. It works across common frameworks, including Flutter, React Native, Swift, Kotlin, React, and Ionic. For teams that ship on more than one surface, that means one place to describe a flow and check it everywhere, rather than juggling separate test stacks.

Each run is recorded and posted, so you can watch what the agent did instead of trusting a pass or fail line. Screenshots mark each step, which makes a failure easy to diagnose without reproducing it yourself. When a test fails in CI and nobody saw it happen, the replay is often what tells you whether the app broke or the test did. It's a small feature that saves a lot of back and forth.

You can schedule flows on triggers or wire them into your pipeline, then get reports through pull requests, email, or Slack. That puts tests in front of the people who need them at the moment a change lands, not in a dashboard someone checks later. For teams already running CI, the value is catching a regression before it ships. Autosana also mentions backend calls for test setup, so flows can prepare their own data.

Teams that prefer version control can keep flows as files in their repository and sync them through GitHub. That keeps tests next to the code they cover and lets changes move through the same review process. It's a fit for engineering orgs that want test definitions tracked and diffed like any other source file, rather than living only in a web dashboard.